In an additional project, we study how state prosecutorial processes (re)produce inequalities through explicit, implicit, and structural biases. In one aspect of the project, we have analyzed statistical evidence to show evidence of racial bias among jury selection processes. Prosecutors in Louisiana, for instance, use a rare process of delayed peremptory challenges, called “backstrikes,” to disproportionately remove Black jurors from the jury, especially when the composition of the jury pool contains greater numbers of White prospective jurors. We have also begun to analyze the ways biases in each step of the prosecutorial process can produce racist, classist, and other unequal outcomes. With detailed administrative data, we will be able to distinguish between implicit or explicit biases among prosecutors and structural factors that systemically reproduce inequalities when prosecutors do not purposefully challenge them.